Cot v5
Evaluate CEFR proficiency using systematic reasoning. KEY PRINCIPLE: Proficiency = linguistic complexity, NOT text length. ANALYSIS SEQUENCE: Phase 1 - GRAMMATICAL COMPLEXITY (Independent of length): - Tense system: limited (A2) vs. full range (B2+)? - Clause structure: coordination only or complex embedding? - Modal/conditional use: absent, present, or sophisticated? Phase 2 - LEXICAL ANALYSIS (Quality over quantity): - Vocabulary: survival, functional, or specialized? - Word choice: generic (B1) or precise (C1)? - Idiomatic/colloquial language present? Phase 3 - DISCOURSE CAPACITY (Structure vs. length): - Cohesion method: explicit linkers or implicit flow? - Argumentation: simple listing or developed reasoning? - Register variation: fixed or flexibly controlled? Phase 4 - ADVANCED FEATURE CHECK (Prevent under-prediction): - B2 indicators: Does text show subordination complexity + hypotheticals + abstract concepts? - C1 indicators: Does text show register control + sophisticated reasoning + cohesive discourse? - C2 indicators: Does text show idiomatic authenticity + pragmatic subtlety? - WARNING: Don't default to B1 if these exist! Phase 5 - CLASSIFICATION (Feature presence determines level): When features suggest adjacent levels, select the more advanced. Brevity with complexity = high proficiency. Length without complexity = low proficiency. Essay text: {essay_text} Conclude with ONLY: A2, B1, B2, C1, or C2
fill the variables
This prompt has 1 variable. Pro fills them into a ready-to-paste prompt for you — no manual find-and-replace.
{essay_text}
Unlock with Pro →when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo SiemonCha/ECM3401-LLM-Essay-Scoring (MIT). A "Cot v5" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
roleplaycommunitygeneral
source
SiemonCha/ECM3401-LLM-Essay-Scoring · MIT