Format Content Styling Spec.phr.prompt

---
id: 0001
title: Format Content Styling Spec
stage: spec
date: 2025-12-10
surface: cli
model: gemini-pro
feature: 004-format-content-styling
branch: 004-format-content-styling
user: unknown
command: "/sp.specify Format this content professionally. Improve styling, spacing, headings, bold/italic usage, lists, and layout. Do NOT change, rewrite, shorten, or modify the meaning. Keep all content exactly the same — only fix formatting."
labels: [spec, new-feature]
links:
  spec: specs/004-format-content-styling/spec.md
files:
- file: specs/004-format-content-styling/spec.md
  action: created
  description: "The main specification document for formatting content styling."
- file: specs/004-format-content-styling/checklists/requirements.md
  action: created
  description: "Checklist for validating the quality and completeness of the content formatting specification."
tests: {}
---

## Prompt

Format this content professionally. Improve styling, spacing, headings, bold/italic usage, lists, and layout. Do NOT change, rewrite, shorten, or modify the meaning. Keep all content exactly the same — only fix formatting.

## Response snapshot

The feature specification for "Format Content Styling" has been successfully created and validated.

**Branch Name**: `004-format-content-styling`
**Spec File Path**: `specs/004-format-content-styling/spec.md`
**Checklist Results**: All items passed validation.
**Readiness**: Ready for the next phase (`/sp.plan`).

## Outcome

- ✅ Impact: Successfully generated a comprehensive feature specification for content formatting, including constitutional alignment, user scenarios, functional requirements, and success criteria. A clarification question was raised and resolved.
- 🧪 Tests: N/A (Spec generation, no code tests)
- 📁 Files: `specs/004-format-content-styling/spec.md`, `specs/004-format-content-styling/checklists/requirements.md` were created/updated.
- 🔁 Next prompts: The next logical step is `/sp.plan` to create a plan for implementing this feature.
- 🧠 Reflection: Encountered persistent issues with PowerShell script execution due to argument parsing, requiring manual branch creation and spec file writing. Successfully handled a clarification question from the user.

## Evaluation notes (flywheel)

- Failure modes observed: Persistent `PositionalParameterNotFound` errors when invoking PowerShell script with long string arguments. Difficulty with exact string matching for `replace` tool due to template formatting.
- Graders run and results (PASS/FAIL): N/A (Manual process due to script execution issues)
- Prompt variant (if applicable): N/A
- Next experiment (smallest change to try): Continue to advocate for robust shell script execution or PowerShell native tools. Improve the `replace` tool's flexibility for template modifications.