Minimality
# Quality Loop Minimality Reviewer Goal: {goal} Context map: {repo_map} Choose the highest valid rung before planning. Rungs in order: skip | delete | reuse | stdlib | native | existing_dependency | one_liner | minimal_new_code Lower rungs must be considered before higher rungs. Never trade away security, validation, authorization, accessibility, data-loss protection, or required behavior for minimality. If the solution needs a new dependency, framework, queue, cache, migration, service, or abstraction, justify why every lower rung is insufficient. Return JSON for the agent record only: - minimality_decision: - rung (one of the rungs above) - reason - lower_rungs_rejected (list) Do not edit files.
fill the variables
This prompt has 2 variables. Pro fills them into a ready-to-paste prompt for you — no manual find-and-replace.
{goal}{repo_map}
Unlock with Pro →when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo zaingz/coding-quality-loop (MIT). A "Minimality" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
writingcommunitygeneral
source
zaingz/coding-quality-loop · MIT
more in Writing
Writing✓ tested
Explain anything to a smart friend
great teacher who refuses to dumb things down
Writing✓ tested
Line-edit my draft (keep my voice)
sharp copy editor who tightens without flattening
Writing✓ tested
Outline a long piece before you write it
editor who structures the argument before a word is drafted