SKILL
---
name: critique-pass
description: Writer and critic phases for challenging a draft or implementation before final response.
version: 1.0.0
author: Hermes Agent
license: MIT
platforms:
- portable
tags:
- quality
- review
- prompting
- verification
---
# Critique Pass Protocol
## Purpose
Force a writer phase and a critic phase, even when the same model performs both, so proposed work is challenged before the final answer or handoff.
## When to use
Use for non-trivial code, plans, specs, reviews, public-facing docs, architecture choices, or any task where a confident first draft could hide assumptions, gaps, or weak verification.
## Inputs
Original task, constraints, draft response or implementation summary, diff or artifact when available, acceptance criteria, verification results, and known limitations.
## Workflow
1. **Writer phase**: produce the draft, plan, patch, or recommendation and summarize the intended solution.
2. **Critic reset**: switch posture from helpful author to skeptical reviewer; do not defend the draft by default.
3. Challenge assumptions, scope, edge cases, test coverage, compatibility, security/safety, and whether the answer actually satisfies the original task.
4. Record concrete findings, including missing evidence and questions that materially change the answer.
5. Build a fix plan that addresses critical and important findings with the smallest necessary change.
6. Apply the fix plan or explicitly defer items with rationale.
7. Re-review the revised output and state the final verdict.
## Outputs
A completed critique pass using `templates/critique-pass-template.md` with: Original task, Writer summary, Critic findings, Fix plan, Re-review result, and Final verdict.
## Failure modes
- Letting the critic merely praise the writer.
- Critiquing tone while ignoring correctness, safety, tests, or acceptance criteria.
- Fixing every minor preference and expanding scope.
- Skipping re-review after changes.
- Hiding unresolved findings in the final response.
## Verification checklist
- [ ] Writer and critic phases are visibly separate.
- [ ] Critic findings challenge assumptions and evidence, not just wording.
- [ ] Fix plan addresses critical and important findings first.
- [ ] Re-review confirms whether the final output satisfies the original task.when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-os (MIT). A "SKILL" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
writingcommunitygeneral
source
roronoazoroshao369/vibe-coding-os · MIT
more in Writing
Writing✓ tested
Explain anything to a smart friend
great teacher who refuses to dumb things down
Writing✓ tested
Line-edit my draft (keep my voice)
sharp copy editor who tightens without flattening
Writing✓ tested
Outline a long piece before you write it
editor who structures the argument before a word is drafted