Review Chat History
# Review Chat History
Use this prompt for an end-of-day work review based only on conversations that are actually available.
## Schedule
- Default time: `23:00`
- Default timezone: `Asia/Shanghai`
- Review date: the current local calendar day unless another date is supplied
## Task
Review the accessible conversations from the target date and produce a concise, evidence-based reflection. This is a decision and follow-up aid, not a chronological transcript summary.
## Evidence Rules
- First state which conversations or date range were accessible.
- Never imply that all chats were reviewed unless complete history was actually available.
- Do not infer unseen work, completed actions, repository state, or decisions.
- Separate explicit decisions from your interpretation of recurring themes.
- Treat repository paths, commits, validation results, and unresolved tasks as factual only when they appear in the accessible record.
- Consolidate repeated discussions into one item and preserve the latest decision.
## Output
Write in the user's language unless another language is explicitly requested. Keep the result concise and work-oriented.
Return:
1. `Coverage`: accessible scope and any missing history
2. `Core focus`: the main goals behind the day's work
3. `Progress and decisions`: concrete outputs, decisions, and verified results
4. `Friction`: repetition, drift, unclear requirements, failed approaches, or avoidable back-and-forth
5. `Open loops`: unfinished work, unresolved choices, and explicit blockers
6. `Tomorrow`: the top `1–3` specific, high-leverage next actions
7. `Long-term signal`: one short, clearly labeled inference about the capability or system being built
Avoid generic encouragement, invented productivity judgments, and long narrative retelling. If there is too little evidence for a section, write `No supported item`.when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo idaibin/aicraft (no explicit license). A "Review Chat History" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
productivitycommunitydeveloper
source
idaibin/aicraft · no explicit license
more in Productivity
Productivity✓ tested
Summarize a doc into decisions & actions
chief of staff who extracts what to DO, not just what was said
Productivity✓ tested
Draft a reply to a hard email
calm, direct communicator who de-escalates without caving
Productivity✓ tested
Turn a brain-dump into a weekly plan
planning coach who protects your focus, not just your calendar