Task Prompt
# Spec-Driven Development in Practice — structured audit
## Context
You are working with **spec-driven-development-in-practice**, Swamy PKV’s **personal learning** workspace for **Spec-Driven Development (SDD)** and deterministic AI system design. The repository is **Markdown-only**: notes, specs, evals, patterns, experiments, and meta-docs.
**Repository structure (topic folders, on demand):**
- `src/notes/` — theory, insights, evolving understanding
- `src/specs/` — behavior specifications, prompt contracts
- `src/evals/` — evaluation strategies, eval loop designs
- `src/patterns/` — SDD patterns and reusable practices
- `src/experiments/` — small experiments and iteration notes
- `docs/` — meta-documentation and guides
- `.github/` — workflows, prompts, skills
- `.cursor/` — Cursor rules and mirrored skills
**Naming:** files use `NN_<slug>.md` (two-digit prefix, kebab-case). Never `00_`. Full contract: `.cursor/rules/09_week-companion-architecture.mdc`.
**Primary objective:**
Perform a structured audit using this repo’s standards. Verify Markdown quality, topic-folder fit, zero-copy and voice, internal links, and produce actionable suggestions.
---
## Verification checks
### A. File content and structure
- Markdown heading hierarchy and fenced code language tags where used.
- Content fits the folder’s purpose (spec vs note vs eval, etc.).
- No stub files for topics not yet started.
### B. Topic unit architecture
- Files that exist follow `NN_<slug>.md` in the correct topic folder.
- On demand: do not require files for topics not present in the tree.
- Authority: `.cursor/rules/09_week-companion-architecture.mdc` and `.github/copilot-instructions.md`.
### C. Naming conventions
- Two-digit prefixes; kebab-case slugs; no `00_` (see `.cursor/rules/07_file-naming-conventions.mdc`).
### D. Content quality
- SDD concepts explained before dense jargon or diagrams.
- First-person learning voice; no instructor or “course” framing.
- Zero-copy: flag text that looks like uncited close paraphrase of external sources.
### E. Cross-references and links
- Internal links resolve.
- No references to internal-only staging material in public docs (see `.cursor/rules/06_source_material_rules.mdc`).
---
## Deliverables
1. Summary of compliance with repository structure and naming.
2. List of issues (file path, severity, description, suggested fix).
3. Up to three clear next steps to improve the repository.
---
## Behavioral expectations
- **Personal-learning focus:** clarity and honest uncertainty are fine; avoid authoritative third-person reference tone.
- **Zero-copy:** flag direct copy or thin rephrase without citation.
- **SDD lens:** specs should be testable in principle; eval content should say how success would be observed.when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo Swamy-s-Tech-Skills-Academy-2026/spec-driven-development-in-practice (MIT). A "Task Prompt" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
productivitycommunitydeveloper
source
Swamy-s-Tech-Skills-Academy-2026/spec-driven-development-in-practice · MIT
more in Productivity
Productivity✓ tested
Summarize a doc into decisions & actions
chief of staff who extracts what to DO, not just what was said
Productivity✓ tested
Draft a reply to a hard email
calm, direct communicator who de-escalates without caving
Productivity✓ tested
Turn a brain-dump into a weekly plan
planning coach who protects your focus, not just your calendar