Validate Prd Tech Spec Traceability.prompt
---
description: "Validate PRD-to-tech-spec requirement traceability, score coverage quality, and identify missing or conflicting mappings."
name: "Validate PRD-Tech Spec Traceability"
argument-hint: "Path to PRD and tech spec files"
agent: "agent"
---
Validate traceability between a PRD and a technical specification.
References:
- [Create PRD Skill](../skills/create-prd/SKILL.md)
- [Create Tech Spec Skill](../skills/create-tech-spec/SKILL.md)
- [Tech Spec Template](../skills/create-tech-spec/assets/tech-spec-template.md)
## Scope
- Confirm product requirements are represented by technical decisions.
- Detect missing, partial, or conflicting mappings.
- Highlight overdesign that is not anchored to PRD scope.
## Validation Steps
1. Extract PRD requirement set:
- Goals
- In-scope and out-of-scope
- Functional requirements (`FR-*`)
- Non-functional requirements (`NFR-*`)
- Success metrics and constraints
2. Extract corresponding tech spec decisions and sections.
3. Build a requirement-to-decision mapping matrix.
4. Classify each requirement as:
- `Mapped`
- `Partially Mapped`
- `Missing`
- `Conflicting`
5. Identify technical decisions with no PRD anchor.
6. Score traceability quality and provide remediation.
## Traceability Quality Rubric (0-100)
- Functional requirement coverage (35)
- Non-functional requirement coverage (25)
- Scope fidelity (15)
- Assumptions and open-question handling (10)
- Validation and acceptance readiness (15)
## Mapping Quality Checks
For each PRD requirement, verify:
- Direct mapping to a technical decision/section
- No contradiction with PRD scope or intent
- Adequate technical specificity for implementation planning
- Observable validation path (testability or measurable outcome)
## Output Format
### Traceability Score
- Overall score: <0-100>
- Rating: <Excellent|Good|Needs Work|High Risk>
- Summary: <2-4 sentences>
### Requirement Mapping Matrix
| PRD ID | Requirement Summary | Tech Spec Section/Decision | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR-1 | <summary> | <section> | <Mapped/Partially Mapped/Missing/Conflicting> | <notes> |
| NFR-1 | <summary> | <section> | <Mapped/Partially Mapped/Missing/Conflicting> | <notes> |
### Unanchored Technical Decisions
- <decision with no PRD linkage>
### Priority Fixes
1. <highest-priority fix>
2. <next fix>
3. <next fix>
### Questions to Resolve
- <question 1>
- <question 2>
### Go/No-Go Recommendation
- Recommendation: <Proceed to implementation planning|Revise tech spec first>
- Minimum changes to proceed:
- <change 1>
- <change 2>when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo lhenrique42/ai-templates (MIT). A "Validate Prd Tech Spec Traceability.prompt" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
productivitycommunitydeveloper
source
lhenrique42/ai-templates · MIT
more in Productivity
Productivity✓ tested
Summarize a doc into decisions & actions
chief of staff who extracts what to DO, not just what was said
Productivity✓ tested
Draft a reply to a hard email
calm, direct communicator who de-escalates without caving
Productivity✓ tested
Turn a brain-dump into a weekly plan
planning coach who protects your focus, not just your calendar