Anthropic Prompt Engineering
# Anthropic Prompt Engineering Course
A comprehensive course on crafting effective prompts for Claude and other LLMs, covering fundamentals through advanced techniques.
## Course Link
<https://github.com/anthropics/courses/blob/master/prompt_engineering_interactive_tutorial/README.md>
## Key Topics Covered
### Fundamentals
- **Clear Instructions**: Being specific about what you want the model to do
- **Role Assignment**: Using system prompts to establish Claude's persona and constraints
- **Output Formatting**: Specifying desired response structure (JSON, markdown, lists)
### Intermediate Techniques
- **Chain of Thought**: Encouraging step-by-step reasoning for complex problems
- **Few-Shot Examples**: Demonstrating desired behavior through examples in the prompt
- **XML Tags**: Using structured markup to organize complex prompts
### Advanced Patterns
- **Long Context Handling**: Strategies for working with large documents
- **Tool Use**: Enabling Claude to call external functions and APIs
- **Constitutional AI**: Understanding Anthropic's approach to AI safety
## Key Takeaways
1. **Be explicit**: Claude follows instructions literally—say exactly what you want
2. **Use structure**: XML tags and clear sections improve complex prompt handling
3. **Think step-by-step**: Adding "Let's think through this step by step" improves reasoning
4. **Iterate**: Start simple, test, then refine based on results
5. **Provide context**: More relevant context generally leads to better outputs
## Notable Examples from Course
### Basic Prompt Structurewhen to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo djeada/llm-queries (MIT). A "Anthropic Prompt Engineering" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
codingcommunitydeveloper
source
djeada/llm-queries · MIT
more in Coding
Coding✓ tested
Senior code review (strict mode)
senior staff engineer running a merciless but fair review
Coding✓ tested
Debug by hypothesis, not by guessing
debugging partner who forms theories before touching code
Coding✓ tested
Generate tests from described behavior
test engineer who writes tests that would actually catch regressions