Compare Feature Bags
# Compare Feature Bags
Use this prompt after normalized feature bags exist for a local AIRoot module
and one or more external references.
## Inputs
- local feature bag, usually `xuunity_light_unity_mcp`
- reference feature bags
- focus area, for example `ui_primitives`, `transport`, or `build_profiles`
- current design question
## Instructions
1. Compare only capabilities whose `focusAreas` include the target focus.
2. Separate `implemented`, `claimed`, `unknown`, and `contradicted`.
3. Treat `implemented` evidence as actionable only when `directAnalog` is not
`false`.
4. Treat `implemented` evidence with `directAnalog: false` as design input, not
backlog.
5. Treat `claimed` evidence as a manual-review task.
6. Do not create backlog candidates from claimed-only or non-direct gaps.
7. Identify:
- what the local module already does better
- which references are stronger for the focus area
- where manual review is required
- which missing capabilities are backed by actionable evidence
- which claims are non-actionable
8. Record data-quality caveats when sources were not installed, benchmarked, or
code-reviewed.
## Direct Analog Checklist
Before calling something a gap, verify:
- the capability status is `implemented`
- the evidence is code/schema/registry/manifest backed
- `directAnalog` is not `false`
- the capability is not only a broad grouped surface
- contradicted evidence is reported separately and never converted to backlog
## Output
Return one JSON object matching:when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo FoxsterDev/ai-research-hub (no explicit license). A "Compare Feature Bags" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
roleplaycommunitygeneral
source
FoxsterDev/ai-research-hub · no explicit license