Discovery Interview
# Discovery Interview Prompt — Stage 1c of Scoping
**Purpose**: Drive the 6-Q decomposition interview after domain research is complete.
**When to use**: AFTER `prompts/domain-research.md` has produced a dossier. NEVER before.
---
## The Pre-Interview Setup
Before asking any question:
1. Review the domain dossier
2. Confirm the industry is correctly identified ("Just to confirm — you're in [X]?")
3. Confirm the engagement type (New Project / Startup / Business Upgrade)
4. Set expectations ("I'll ask 6 specific questions; each requires a concrete answer")
---
## The 6-Q Framework
For EACH question, follow this structure:
1. **Acknowledge** what you know from the dossier
2. **Infer** what their context likely is
3. **Ask** the targeted question with a request for a number
---
### Q1 — The Specific Process
❌ Bad:
- "What problem are you trying to solve?"
- "Tell me about your business"
✅ Good (informed by dossier):
- "Based on my research, the top pain in [industry] is [X]. Which specific process are you targeting? Not 'everything' — pick ONE. Examples: [industry-specific options]."
**Drill deeper**:
- "How often does this process run? Daily? Weekly?"
- "Who currently owns it?"
- "What's the volume? [Number] per [period]?"
**Output**: Specific process named with volume/frequency.
### Q2 — The Decision / Output Type
❌ Bad:
- "What do you want the AI to do?"
✅ Good:
- "What kind of decision or output? Pick one:
- Classification (this is X / not X)
- Probability score (X% chance of Y)
- Ranking (sort these by Z)
- Generation (write/draft/summarize)
- Recommendation (suggest action)
- Prediction (forecast value Y at time T)"
**Drill deeper**:
- "What's the latency requirement? Real-time (<1s), near-real-time (<10s), or batch (hours)?"
- "What's the accuracy/quality threshold? (X%)"
**Output**: Decision type with latency and accuracy targets.
### Q3 — Data Availability
❌ Bad:
- "Do you have data?"
✅ Good:
- "What data is available for this process?
- Volume: [N records / N GB]
- Latency: [real-time stream / daily batch / historical only]
- Quality: [clean / messy / unlabeled / partially labeled]
- Compliance: [any PII / PHI / regulated data]
- Retention: [how far back]
- Format: [structured / unstructured / both]"
**Drill deeper**:
- "If unlabeled, who would label? Cost per label? Time?"
- "Who owns the data? Can we use it for training?"
- "What's the data refresh rate?"
**Output**: Data inventory with quantity, quality, and constraints.
### Q4 — Cost of Error
❌ Bad:
- "How bad is it if the AI is wrong?"
✅ Good:
- "What's the cost of a wrong decision?
- Direct cost: $X per wrong decision
- Indirect cost: [rework, customer churn, compliance]
- Regulatory exposure: [any fines, legal liability]
- Safety risk: [any physical safety implications]
- Reputation risk: [public-facing or internal]"
**Drill deeper**:
- "What's the distribution? (95% safe, 5% catastrophic? Or 50/50 mediocre?)"
- "Is human review possible/required for high-stakes cases?"
**Output**: Quantified cost of error with risk distribution.
### Q5 — Current System
❌ Bad:
- "How do you do it now?"
✅ Good:
- "What does the current system look like?
- Manual: [X people, Y hours per task]
- Rules-based: [what rules, who maintains]
- ML model: [what model, when deployed, current accuracy]
- Vendor SaaS: [which one, cost, satisfaction]
- Spreadsheet: [how many, who maintains]"
**Drill deeper**:
- "What's the current performance? (X% accuracy, Y hour turnaround)"
- "What works well about it? (Don't fix what's not broken)"
- "What's the biggest frustration?"
**Output**: Current state with performance baseline.
### Q6 — Success Metric
❌ Bad:
- "How will you measure success?"
✅ Good:
- "What does success look like, in business terms?
- Revenue: [€X/year enabled]
- Cost: [€Y/year saved]
- Time: [Z hours/week freed up]
- Risk: [€A/year risk reduced]
- Customer: [NPS +X, churn -Y%]
- Employee: [morale, retention]"
**Drill deeper**:
- "How will we measure this? [dashboard, quarterly review, audit]"
- "What's the threshold for 'good enough'? [specific number]"
- "What's the minimum viable improvement to proceed? [baseline + X%]"
**Output**: Quantified success metric with measurement plan.
---
## Handling Vague Answers
When the user can't give a number, push back:when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo selectess/fde-consultants-protocoles (Apache-2.0). A "Discovery Interview" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
careercommunitygeneral
source
selectess/fde-consultants-protocoles · Apache-2.0