Evidence Quality Audit
# Evidence Quality Audit
## Objective
Determine whether retained evidence actually proves the claims attached to it.
## Inputs
- Execution records and acceptance links.
- Test, build, runtime, screenshot, device, manual, and external evidence.
- Source revision, environment, and generation provenance.
- Mechanical gate reports and prior completion claims.
## Review method
Check relevance, level, freshness, provenance, reproducibility, environment,
source revision, and independence for every material claim. Detect circular
evidence, self-authored success labels, stale screenshots, fixture-only proof,
missing raw output, changed code after tests, and reports that merely confirm a
file exists.
## Hard rules
- Evidence must support the specific acceptance item that cites it.
- Generated evidence needs its generator, inputs, command, revision, and schema.
- Manual evidence needs actor, time, environment, procedure, and result.
- Inconclusive or inaccessible evidence cannot be upgraded to pass.
- A passing aggregate score cannot override missing tier-zero evidence.
## Output
Write `review/evidence-audit.json` using the dimension report contract with
`dimension: evidence-quality`.when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo ameedanxari/ai-prompt-library (MIT). A "Evidence Quality Audit" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
roleplaycommunitygeneral
source
ameedanxari/ai-prompt-library · MIT