Exercise 2.2 -- Quality Comparison
# Exercise 2.2 -- Quality Comparison
**Context Engineering Layer: Validation** -- Measure the impact of noise reduction on output quality
## Goal
Re-run the same 3 contract reviews with your optimized ~400-word CLAUDE.md and compare the scores against your Module 1 baseline. This proves (or disproves) that cutting noise improves output.
## Prerequisites
- Completed Exercise 1.2 (you have baseline scores)
- Completed Exercise 2.1 (you have the optimized CLAUDE.md)
## What You Have
- Your `CLAUDE-optimized.md` from Exercise 2.1
- Your `baseline-scores.md` from Exercise 1.2
- The same 3 sample contracts
- `measurement-templates/quality-scorecard.md`
- `measurement-templates/before-after-log.md`
## Your Tasks
### Step 1: Deploy the Optimized CLAUDE.md
Copy your `CLAUDE-optimized.md` to `starter-agent/CLAUDE.md` (back up the original first):when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo shahabmalikAI5/ai-context-engineering-workshop (no explicit license). A "Exercise 2.2 -- Quality Comparison" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
codingcommunitydeveloper
source
shahabmalikAI5/ai-context-engineering-workshop · no explicit license
more in Coding
Coding✓ tested
Senior code review (strict mode)
senior staff engineer running a merciless but fair review
Coding✓ tested
Debug by hypothesis, not by guessing
debugging partner who forms theories before touching code
Coding✓ tested
Generate tests from described behavior
test engineer who writes tests that would actually catch regressions