Prompt First Speed vs Spec Discipline
# Prompt-first speed versus spec discipline
I'm sorting out two different ways AI shows up in how I build things. One path optimizes for
**velocity**: I state what I want in natural language, iterate on the output, and the conversation
starts to double as an informal spec. The other path optimizes for **durability**: I nail down intent in
an explicit, reviewable specification and treat generated code as something that must match that
intent.
Both are legitimate; the mistake I'm trying to avoid is using the fast path **by default** when the
stakes are high, then wondering why maintenance hurts.
## Two loops side by sidewhen to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo Swamy-s-Tech-Skills-Academy-2026/spec-driven-development-in-practice (MIT). A "Prompt First Speed vs Spec Discipline" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
roleplaycommunitygeneral
source
Swamy-s-Tech-Skills-Academy-2026/spec-driven-development-in-practice · MIT