Deep Research Prompt
# Stage 1 — Deep Research Prompt > **How to use this template** > 1. Copy this file to a working location — **once per chapter** of your outline. > 2. Replace every `{{PLACEHOLDER}}`. The CONTEXT block stays the same across all runs; the TASK and SCOPE blocks change each run. > 3. Delete every bracketed `[guidance note]`. > 4. Run each filled prompt in **Google Gemini with Deep Research mode enabled**, as a separate conversation. > 5. Save each result to its own document, named by chapter. > > Run one chapter per conversation — not the whole work at once. Deep Research has a finite attention budget per task; focused runs return deeper, better-sourced results. --- ## CONTEXT — read carefully, this frames the task I am writing a {{WORK_TYPE}} in the field of {{FIELD_OF_STUDY}}. **Topic:** {{WORK_TOPIC}} **Overview of the work:** {{WORK_OVERVIEW — 3–6 sentences. The same overview in every run, so each research pass shares context.}} **Structure of the work:** {{HIGH_LEVEL_OUTLINE — the full chapter list from Stage 0, so the model knows where this chapter sits in the whole.}} **Already covered in earlier runs:** {{ALREADY_COVERED — name the chapters already researched, so this run does not duplicate them. For the first run, write "none — this is the first research run".}} **Bibliography requirements for the work:** {{BIBLIOGRAPHY_REQUIREMENTS — total source count, how many must be peer-reviewed (journal articles, monographs, dissertations), and any language requirements.}} ## YOUR TASK IN THIS RUN Collect authoritative sources and detailed theses for **{{SECTION_TITLE}}**. I do not need a bare list of links. I need **detailed theses**: for each source, what exactly the author claims, what data or figures they cite, what conclusions they draw, and how it can be used in my work. **Critical requirements:** - Every thesis is tied to a specific source — author(s), title, year, journal or publisher, volume/issue and pages where applicable, and a DOI or URL where available. - Priority of source types: peer-reviewed journal articles, monographs, official reports and standards. Industry analyst reports are acceptable for market data. Avoid blogs and unattributed web pages except as supplementary material. - Recency: {{RECENCY — e.g. "prioritise 2020–2026, but foundational classic works are also required".}} - Languages: {{LANGUAGE_MIX — e.g. "roughly 60% English, 40% [language]", or simply the source language(s) to use.}} - **Do not invent sources.** Do not approximate a citation you are unsure of. If you cannot verify a source's details, say so explicitly rather than guessing. A flagged uncertainty is useful; a fabricated citation is harmful. - Where a source includes a table, chart, or figure that would be usable in the work, describe it and note where it can be found. ## SCOPE OF THIS RUN Below are the subsections of this chapter and the specific questions each one needs sources for. Cover every subsection. [For each subsection, fill in the block below. Duplicate the block as many times as there are subsections.] ### {{SUBSECTION_ID}}. {{SUBSECTION_TITLE}} Sources and theses needed on: {{SUBSECTION_QUESTIONS — the specific questions, sub-topics, debates, and data points that need sources. If the field has canonical authors or works that MUST be covered for this subsection, name them here. Be concrete: specific questions yield specific, usable theses; vague prompts yield filler.}} [— end of subsection block; duplicate as needed —] ## OUTPUT FORMAT For each subsection, produce: ### [Subsection number and title] **THESES WITH SOURCES:** 1. [A developed thesis — 3–5 sentences, with concrete data or figures] → **Source:** [Author(s), "Title", Journal/Publisher, Year, Volume/Issue, Pages, DOI/URL] 2. … (Minimum {{MIN_THESES}} theses per subsection. For chapters central to the work's argument, aim higher.) **ADDITIONAL SOURCES** (to broaden the bibliography — brief: author, title, year, type): - … **USABLE TABLES / FIGURES** (if any source contains data displays worth reproducing): - [Description of the table or figure, the source, and where in it to find them.] **GAPS:** If sources are scarce or absent for any question above, state it plainly. Do not fill a gap with a weak or invented source.
fill the variables
This prompt has 8 variables. Pro fills them into a ready-to-paste prompt for you — no manual find-and-replace.
{{PLACEHOLDER}{{WORK_TYPE}{{FIELD_OF_STUDY}{{WORK_TOPIC}{{SECTION_TITLE}{{SUBSECTION_ID}{{SUBSECTION_TITLE}{{MIN_THESES}
Unlock with Pro →when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo mcqx4/scriptorium (MIT). A "Deep Research Prompt" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
productivitycommunitydeveloper
source
mcqx4/scriptorium · MIT
more in Productivity
Productivity✓ tested
Summarize a doc into decisions & actions
chief of staff who extracts what to DO, not just what was said
Productivity✓ tested
Draft a reply to a hard email
calm, direct communicator who de-escalates without caving
Productivity✓ tested
Turn a brain-dump into a weekly plan
planning coach who protects your focus, not just your calendar