Research
# User-invoked prompt · research (v1.8.1) > Multi-agent parallel research → synthesized wiki draft with built-in > counter-bias check + decoupled CitationAgent verification. ROUTER reads > this when the user wants to seed a new wiki entry from external sources. ## Trigger keywords - `调研一下 X` / `深挖 X` / `多角度研究 X` - `research X` / `deep dive X` - `/research <topic>` (slash command escape hatch with arguments) ## Argument parsing ROUTER extracts: - `topic` (required, free-form string) - `depth` ∈ {`normal`, `deep`} (default `normal` = 5 agents; `deep` = 8) - `thesis` (optional string; if provided, agents weigh for/against) If natural language ambiguity (e.g. "research stablecoins"), ROUTER may ask 1 clarifying question (which angle, what scope) before launching. Limit clarification to ONE round to keep total time ≤ 7 minutes. ## Pre-flight 1. Verify cwd is a second-brain repo (`meta/` + `wiki/` exist). If not, refuse and tell user `/research` writes wiki entries; must run inside a second-brain vault. 2. Read `wiki/SCHEMA.md` to confirm frontmatter contract. 3. List `wiki/` domain directories. Cache list — synthesis must place the draft under one of these (or explicitly create new with user approval). 4. Estimate cost upfront: tell user "Spawning N agents — estimated 6-9 min and ~$0.40-1.00 in API tokens (includes citation verifier). Continue?" Wait for "yes" or "go". (Skip estimate prompt if user explicitly typed `/research`; that's already opt-in.) ## Phase 1 · Decompose (main context, ~30 sec) Decompose `<topic>` into N angles where N=5 (normal) or N=8 (deep): **Normal (5 angles)**: 1. **academic** — peer-reviewed papers, formal definitions, established models 2. **practitioner** — industry blog posts, conference talks, current implementations 3. **contrarian** — known critiques, failed implementations, opposing schools 4. **origin** — historical first-principles, who coined the concept and why 5. **adjacent** — neighboring fields that touch the topic from outside **Deep adds (3 more)**: 6. **mechanistic** — how does it actually work at the mechanism level (math, data flow, protocol) 7. **data-statistics** — quantitative evidence, benchmark results, market sizes 8. **meta-review** — what surveys / systematic reviews already exist For each angle, write a 1-sentence brief (e.g. "academic: find peer-reviewed papers from 2020-2026 on X; identify the 2-3 most-cited"). Cache angles for phase 2 + show user the angle list before launching agents (1 line each). ## Phase 2 · Parallel research (5-8 subagents, ~5 min hard cap) In a SINGLE message, launch all N subagents in parallel (one Task tool call per agent within the same message — Claude Code parallelism requirement). Subagent type: `general-purpose` Each subagent receives:
fill the variables
This prompt has 1 variable. Pro fills them into a ready-to-paste prompt for you — no manual find-and-replace.
{`normal`, `deep`}
Unlock with Pro →when to use it
Community prompt sourced from the open-source GitHub repo jasonhnd/life_OS (NOASSERTION). A "Research" style prompt — adapt the placeholders and specifics to your task. Imported as-is and not independently retested here, so check the output before relying on it.
tags
productivitycommunitydeveloper
source
jasonhnd/life_OS · NOASSERTION
more in Productivity
Productivity✓ tested
Summarize a doc into decisions & actions
chief of staff who extracts what to DO, not just what was said
Productivity✓ tested
Draft a reply to a hard email
calm, direct communicator who de-escalates without caving
Productivity✓ tested
Turn a brain-dump into a weekly plan
planning coach who protects your focus, not just your calendar